Scopus title suggestion: Can the publisher of a title question the review decision?

Yes, but complaints or objections to review decisions are usually resolved between the publisher and the Scopus team, who will consult with the reviewers of the CSAB if needed. If the decision continues to be questioned, there is an appeal procedure.  

Appeals are only considered in cases of significant mistakes that, without correction, would have led to the journal’s rejection, and where there are no other reasons for rejection of the journal. Appeals are not intended for disagreements about the quality of the journal, comparisons with other journals already covered by Scopus, or proof that the journal meets other selection criteria. 

To invoke the appeals procedure, the publisher of the journal needs to: 

• provide clear evidence of these significant factual errors 
• submit an appeal to the Scopus team by emailing [email protected] within six weeks of receiving the rejection letter.  

By asking for an appeal, the publisher agrees to accept the findings of any appeal as final. Appeals are submitted to the independent Appeals Officer, who will determine if the appeal is warranted. In case of a valid appeal, the reviewers of the CSAB will be asked to reconsider the review process and decision. However, a valid appeal case does not guarantee that the CSAB will change its decision.